Skip to content
INVESTOR VOICE · QUALITATIVE EVIDENCE

Build around the diligence workflow, not the database demo.

We reviewed public investor discussions, user-review corpora, product documentation, and semiconductor-network research before changing the product. This is a self-selected VoC sample, not a statistically representative survey.

7coded workflow themes
19linked public evidence pages
0paid database records copied
2026-08-04research snapshot
Coded themes

What investors said. What the product does.

Qualitative, self-selected public VoC sample. Evidence links identify recurring workflow problems; counts are not a market survey or sentiment score.

P0Emerging funds, independent analysts, journalists, founders

Price and export friction block routine research

Users repeatedly describe seat pricing, gated trials, export credits, and API tiers as barriers to basic screening and collaboration.

Product response

Keep company, round, investor, and source records readable without login and publish filterable JSON and CSV alongside the interface.

3 evidence links
P0Seed investors, regional funds, corporate venture teams

Early-stage, smaller, and non-US coverage arrives late

Reviewers and practitioners report missing young companies, regional gaps, and stale company or workforce fields across private-market databases.

Product response

Show the latest indexed source date, evidence class, geography, and revision state on every profile; preserve the last validated record when a check fails and never imply that source age proves current operations.

3 evidence links
P0Investment committees, hedge funds, researchers, journalists

A number without its source cannot survive diligence

Users struggle to reconcile contradictory round totals, valuation bases, changing cumulative values, and records whose provenance is difficult to inspect.

Product response

Attach the controlling source, announcement date, native currency, transaction type, amount qualifier, and revision note to every capital fact.

3 evidence links
P0VC sourcing, corporate development, PE, supply-chain investors

Investors need relationships, not isolated company cards

Company, round, investor, founder, technology, customer, and supplier records are often difficult to traverse as one evidence-backed graph.

Product response

Normalize startup-to-round-to-investor relationships, support reverse investor lookup, and expose co-investor and sector paths without inferring ownership or allocation.

3 evidence links
P0Associates, analysts, domain specialists

Screening must be fast, explainable, and shareable

Dense filters can be hard to learn, while shallow search forces users to repeat work across databases, websites, and spreadsheets.

Product response

Search company, founder, investor, technology, application, geography, stage, and source text together; keep filters in the URL and explain why each result matched.

3 evidence links
P1Deal teams and readers comparing unfamiliar companies

Opaque scores and popularity signals can create false confidence

Composite scores, tags, launch votes, and community attention are easy to overread when their construction or manipulation controls are hidden.

Product response

Keep launches, community attention, hiring, and articles as dated discovery signals; never turn them into an investment-quality score or financing fact.

3 evidence links
P1Founders, investors, analysts, company communications teams

Users need a correction path at the point of doubt

A stale or wrong private-company record persists when reporting an issue requires leaving the workflow or negotiating account access.

Product response

Place a source-suggestion and data-correction action on each profile, carrying the company and current page into a direct message to VLSI Korea.

2 evidence links
Continuous VoC

Add the workflow we missed.

Corrections and feature requests go directly to VLSI Korea with the page context and any public source you provide.

OPEN CORRECTION LOOP

Tell us what is missing or wrong.

Attach a public source when possible. Feedback is delivered to VLSI Korea; this page does not keep a public copy.

Use email instead

Delivered to VLSI Korea through FormSubmit. Service details · VLSI Korea privacy